Importance of Growth Factors and Bone Maturation Ratio in the Response to Growth Hormone Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to identify the influence of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-1), IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and bone age (BA)/chronological age (CA) ratio on the response to GH therapy after 1 and 2 years of treatment and upon reaching final height. METHODS: Longitudinal, retrospective, observational study of 139 patients treated for idiopathic growth hormone deficiency. Variables examined during follow-up: (1) genetic background; (2) perinatal history; (3) anthropometry; (4) height velocity, BA, BA/CA and height prognosis; (5) analytical results (IGF-1, IGFBP-3). Final response variables: adult height (AH), AH with respect to target height, AH with respect to initial height prognosis, AH with respect to height at the start of treatment, and AH with respect to height at onset of puberty. RESULTS: Lower pretreatment IGF-1 levels and a greater increase in IGF-1 at the end of treatment imply a better response (r = -0.405, P = .007 and r = 0.274, P = .014, respectively), as does a greater increase in IGFBP-3 after 2 years of treatment and at the end of treatment (r = 0.207, P = .035 and r = 0.259, P = .020, respectively). A lower BA/CA ratio pretreatment and at the onset of puberty results in a better response (r = -0.502, P = .000 and r = -0.548, P = .000, respectively), as does a lower increase in BA and BA/CA ratio after the 1 and 2 years of treatment (r = -0.337, P = .000 and r = -0.332, P = .000, respectively). CONCLUSION: Low pretreatment IGF-1, a greater BA delay with respect to CA pretreatment and at the onset of puberty, a greater increase in IGFBP-3 after 2 years of treatment, and a lower increase in BA and BA/CA ratio after 1 and 2 years of treatment imply a better long-term response.

Recomendaciones para profesionales no anestesiólogos en procedimientos de sedoanalgesia / Recommendations for non-anaesthesia providers in sedation and analgesia procedures

El dolor, y la ansiedad que este produce, son las primeras causas de sufrimiento en los niños que acuden a los servicios de urgencias, motivando un aumento del interés de padres y sanitarios para proporcionar una adecuada analgesia y sedación.Por ello, en los últimos años se ha producido un incremento en el número de procedimientos diagnósticos y terapéuticos en niños que requieren sedoanalgesia en urgencias pediátricas, lo que ha originado una necesidad de formación de personal no anestesiólogo para cubrir ese requisito sin afectar a la seguridad del paciente.El objetivo de este documento de consenso es establecer recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia científica, elaboradas y consensuadas por el Grupo de Trabajo de Sedoanalgesia de la Sociedad Española de Urgencias de Pediatría, sobre las competencias y la capacitación del personal que realiza procedimientos de sedoanalgesia para conseguir un óptimo manejo del paciente pediátrico antes, durante y después del procedimiento en los servicios de urgencias pediátricas.El documento de consenso se ha estructurado en dos partes: la primera hace referencia a las competencias del personal no anestesiólogo que realiza procedimientos de sedoanalgesia, y la segunda, a la forma de obtener la capacitación necesaria. Se ha elaborado un listado de preguntas de investigación, se han definido unas palabras clave y se ha realizado una búsqueda bibliográfica desglosando la evidencia disponible. Los resultados se muestran como conclusiones, sometidas a votación anónima por cada uno de los miembros del Grupo de Trabajo. En cada conclusión se indica el porcentaje obtenido en la votación. (AU)

Pain and the anxiety that it produces are the main sources of suffering in children managed in emergency departments, eliciting a growing interest in parents and health care providers in the adequate provision of sedation and analgesia.In consequence, the number of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that require sedation and/or analgesia in paediatric emergency departments has increased in recent years, which has generated a need to train non-anaesthesiologists on how to provide this care without affecting patient safety.The objective of this document is to establish evidence-based recommendations, developed by consensus by the Working Group on Sedation and Analgesia of the Sociedad Española de Urgencias de Pediatría, regarding the competencies and training of staff who perform sedation or analgesia procedures to achieve the greatest possible quality in the management of paediatric patients before, during and after these procedures in the paediatric emergency care setting.The consensus document has been structured in two parts: the first addresses the competencies of non-anaesthesiologists who perform sedoanalgesia procedures, and the second how to obtain the necessary training. A list of research questions was prepared, keywords defined and a literature search carried out to break down and summarise the available evidence. The results are presented in the form of conclusions, which were subjected to anonymous voting by each of the members of the working group. For each of the conclusions, we provide the percent agreement obtained in the voting. (AU)

Recommendations for non-anaesthesia providers in sedation and analgesia procedures.

Pain and the anxiety that it produces are the main sources of suffering in children managed in emergency departments, eliciting a growing interest in parents and health care providers in the adequate provision of sedation and analgesia. In consequence, the number of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that require sedation and/or analgesia in paediatric emergency departments has increased in recent years, which has generated a need to train non-anaesthesiologists on how to provide this care without affecting patient safety. The objective of this document is to establish evidence-based recommendations, developed by consensus by the Working Group on Sedation and Analgesia of the Sociedad Española de Urgencias de Pediatría, regarding the competencies and training of staff who perform sedation or analgesia procedures to achieve the greatest possible quality in the management of paediatric patients before, during and after these procedures in the paediatric emergency care setting. The consensus document has been structured in two parts: the first addresses the competencies of non-anaesthesiologists who perform sedoanalgesia procedures, and the second how to obtain the necessary training. A list of research questions was prepared, keywords defined and a literature search carried out to break down and summarise the available evidence. The results are presented in the form of conclusions, which were subjected to anonymous voting by each of the members of the working group. For each of the conclusions, we provide the percent agreement obtained in the voting.

Perinatal factors influence on the neurocognitive development of children born small for gestational age (SGA) during the first 2 years of life.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Children born small for gestational age (SGA) show higher risk of neurodevelopmental and cognitive abnormalities. The objective of this study is to determine in children born SGA the neurodevelopment during the first 2 years of life and to establish the influence of anthropometric data, gestational age, multiple gestation and perinatal factors. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Observational, prospective, descriptive and analytical study of the neurocognitive assessment performed, with Brunet-Lézine test, on SGA children (n = 91) from 3 to 24 months of age, comparing with own controls. RESULTS: Ninety-one SGA children, 47% girls, 83.5% single pregnancies; mean gestational age 37.7 weeks (standard deviation (SD) 2.1). Weight at birth 2053 g (SD 433.1), length 43.9 cm (SD 2.6) and head circumference 31.7 cm (SD 1.7). The SGA population shows significantly lower neurodevelopment than the control population, with a tendency to improve during the first 2 years of life. There are no differences by sex. SGA children born to multiple gestations have lower neurodevelopment only during the first year of life. There is a direct and positive correlation between weight, length and head circumference with neurocognitive development at 6, 9, 12 and 18 months. Gestational age correlated with better neurodevelopment at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Children born SGA present lower neurodevelopment than the control population. A greater impact on weight, length, and head circumference at birth is correlated with poorer neurocognitive development. Multiparity does not show significant influence on neurodevelopment evolution.

Growth hormone deficit: Influence of puberty on the response to treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Short stature is the most frequent reason for consultation in Pediatric Endocrinology consultations and sometimes requires treatment with growth hormone. The aim of the study was to analyze the response to treatment based on its onset in pubertal or prepubertal stages and to analyze the possible benefit of an early onset. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Longitudinal, retrospective and observational study in 139 patients treated for idiopathic growth hormone deficiency up to adult height. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: (a) genetic background: maternal, paternal and genetic height; (b) perinatal history; (c) anthropometry during follow-up and at pubertal onset: weight, height, body mass index; (d) variables during follow-up and at pubertal onset: growth rate, bone age and growth prognosis. Final response variables: adult height, adult height with respect to target height, adult height with respect to initial growth prediction, adult height with respect to initial height at the start of treatment and adult height with respect to height at pubertal onset. RESULTS: Total pubertal gain was 0.84 ± 0.6 SD. 61.9% of the patients started treatment with rhGH in prepuberty. The initiation of treatment in the prepubertal stage and a higher total pubertal gain are correlated with a better final height (P = 0.001 and r = 0.507, P = 0.00, respectively). Furthermore, a longer duration of treatment in pre-puberty is correlated with a better final response (r = 0.328, P = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: The start of treatment in the prepubertal stage and its longer duration during this period are determining factors to achieve a good long-term response. Total pubertal gain was greater in patients who started treatment in the pubertal stage.

Déficit de hormona de crecimiento: influencia de la pubertad en la respuesta al tratamiento / Growth hormone deficit: Influence of puberty on the response to treatment

Introducción: La talla baja es motivo de consulta frecuente en Endocrinología Pediátrica, precisando en ocasiones tratamiento con hormona del crecimiento (GH). El objetivo del estudio fue analizar la respuesta al tratamiento en función de su inicio en la etapa puberal o prepuberal y analizar el posible beneficio de un comienzo precoz. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio longitudinal, retrospectivo y observacional en 139 pacientes tratados por déficit de GH idiopático (grave o parcial) hasta talla adulta. Principales variables estudiadas: a) antecedentes familiares: talla materna, paterna y genética; b) antecedentes perinatales; c) antropometría durante el seguimiento y al inicio puberal: peso, talla, índice de masa corporal, y d) variables durante el seguimiento y al inicio puberal: velocidad de crecimiento, edad ósea y pronóstico de crecimiento. Variables de respuesta final: talla adulta, talla adulta respecto a talla genética, talla adulta respecto al pronóstico de crecimiento inicial, talla adulta respecto a talla al inicio del tratamiento y talla adulta respecto a talla al inicio puberal. Resultados: La ganancia puberal total fue de 0,84±0,6 DE. Un 61,9% de los pacientes iniciaron tratamiento con GH en prepubertad. El inicio del tratamiento en la etapa prepuberal y una mayor ganancia puberal total se relacionaron con una mejor talla final (p=0,001, y r=0,507, p=0,00 respectivamente). Además, una mayor duración del tratamiento en la prepubertad se correlacionó con una mejor respuesta final (r=0,328, p=0,00). Conclusiones: El inicio del tratamiento en la prepubertad y una mayor duración durante este periodo son factores determinantes para alcanzar una mejor respuesta a largo plazo. La ganancia puberal total fue mayor en los pacientes que iniciaron el tratamiento en etapa puberal. (AU)

Introduction: Short stature is the most frequent reason for consultation in Pediatric Endocrinology consultations and sometimes requires treatment with growth hormone. The aim of the study was to analyze the response to treatment based on its onset in pubertal or prepubertal stages and to analyze the possible benefit of an early onset. Patients and methods: Longitudinal, retrospective and observational study in 139 patients treated for idiopathic growth hormone deficiency up to adult height. Main variables studied: (a) genetic background: maternal, paternal and genetic height; (b) perinatal history; (c) anthropometry during follow-up and at pubertal onset: weight, height, body mass index; (d) variables during follow-up and at pubertal onset: growth rate, bone age and growth prognosis. Final response variables: adult height, adult height with respect to target height, adult height with respect to initial growth prediction, adult height with respect to initial height at the start of treatment and adult height with respect to height at pubertal onset. Results: Total pubertal gain was 0.84±0.6 SD. 61.9% of the patients started treatment with rhGH in prepuberty. The initiation of treatment in the prepubertal stage and a higher total pubertal gain are correlated with a better final height (P=.001 and r=0.507, P=.00, respectively). Furthermore, a longer duration of treatment in pre-puberty is correlated with a better final response (r=0.328, P=.00). Conclusions: The start of treatment in the prepubertal stage and its longer duration during this period are determining factors to achieve a good long-term response. Total pubertal gain was greater in patients who started treatment in the pubertal stage. (AU)

Growth hormone deficit. Does the first year of treatment influence adult height?

INTRODUCTION: Short stature is the most frequent reason for Pediatric Endocrinology consultations and sometimes requires treatment with growth hormone. OBJECTIVE: The possible correlation of a good response to any early response factor with a better final response was studied, and also whether there was a difference in response to treatment according to the type of deficit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a longitudinal, retrospective and observational study of 139 patients treated for idiopathic growth hormone deficiency up to adult height. There were good response criteria in the first year of treatment: a) an increase in growth rate ≥3 cm/year, b) a growth rate ≥1 standard deviation (SD), c) an increase in height ≥0.5 SD, d) an increase in height ≥0.3 SD. Study of the Index of Responsiveness to treatment in the first and second year. Final response variables: adult height with respect to target height, adult height with respect to initial growth prediction and adult height with respect to initial height at the start of treatment. The possible correlation of a good response to any of the early response factors with a better final response to treatment was studied, and also whether there was a difference in the response to treatment according to the type of deficit. RESULTS: The treatment produced a gain in adult height with respect to genetic height of 0.06 ±â€¯0.7 SD. Patients considered good responders in the first year of treatment presented a better final response (growth rate ≥3 cm: p = 0.000, growth rate ≥1 SD: p = 0.008, height gain ≥0.5 SD: p = 0.007, height gain ≥0.3 SD: p = 0.006), as well as patients with a severe deficit (p = 0.04). The index of responsiveness to treatment during the first year was associated with a better final response (r = 0.249, p = 0.003), with this correlation being maintained in the second year (r = 0.294, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Growth hormone treatment increased height in the genetic target. The percentage of good responders varied depending on the criteria used. The response in the first year of treatment and a severe deficit were determining factors for achieving a good long-term response.

Perinatal factors influence on the neurocognitive development of children born small for gestational age (SGA) during the first 2 years of life. / Influencia de factores perinatales en el desarrollo neurocognitivo de niños nacidos pequeños para la edad gestacional durante los primeros 2 años de vida.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Children born small for gestational age (SGA) show higher risk of neurodevelopmental and cognitive abnormalities. The objective of this study is to determine in children born SGA the neurodevelopment during the first 2 years of life and to establish the influence of anthropometric data, gestational age, multiple gestation and perinatal factors. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Observational, prospective, descriptive and analytical study of the neurocognitive assessment performed, with Brunet-Lézine test, on SGA children (n=91) from 3 to 24 months of age, comparing with own controls. RESULTS: Ninety-one SGA children, 47% girls, 83.5% single pregnancies; mean gestational age 37.7 weeks (standard deviation [SD] 2.1). Weight at birth 2,053g (SD 433.1), length 43.9cm (SD 2.6) and head circumference 31.7cm (SD 1.7). The SGA population shows significantly lower neurodevelopment than the control population, with a tendency to improve during the first 2 years of life. There are no differences by sex. SGA children born to multiple gestations have lower neurodevelopment only during the first year of life. There is a direct and positive correlation between weight, length and head circumference with neurocognitive development at 6, 9, 12 and 18 months. Gestational age correlated with better neurodevelopment at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Children born SGA present lower neurodevelopment than the control population. A greater impact on weight, length, and head circumference at birth is correlated with poorer neurocognitive development. Multiparity does not show significant influence on neurodevelopment evolution.

Cribado neonatal de fibrosis quística: análisis y diferencias de los niveles de tripsina inmunorreactiva en recién nacidos con cribado positivo / Neonatal cystic fibrosis screening: Analysis and differences in immunoreactive trypsin levels in newborns with a positive screen

Introducción: El cribado neonatal de fibrosis quística (FQ) ha permitido el diagnóstico precoz de la enfermedad, siendo determinante en el aumento de supervivencia de estos pacientes. Su principal inconveniente es su baja especificidad y elevado número de falsos positivos. El objetivo fue analizar las diferencias de tripsina inmunorreactiva (TIR) entre los diferentes grupos de recién nacidos (RN) con cribado neonatal positivo según fueran sanos, portadores sanos, afectos de FQ o Cystic Fibrosis Screen Positive, Inconclusive Diagnosis (CFSPID). Material: Estudio retrospectivo analítico de las concentraciones de TIR en RN con cribado neonatal positivo para FQ nacidos en un hospital de tercer nivel durante 8 años. Resultados:Se analizaron 790RN con cribado neonatal positivo para FQ, 86,3% a término, 53% niñas y 11,8% ingresados. El valor medio de TIR fue 79,16ng/ml (rango 60-367). Se encontraron concentraciones significativamente más elevadas de TIR en afectos de FQ con respecto a los otros grupos (p<0,001). Existen niveles superiores en grandes prematuros (p=0,007) e ingresados (p=0,002). No difieren en cuanto a sexo o estacionalidad. Existe una correlación directa del 64% (p=0,001) entre TIR y test del sudor en afectos de FQ y CFSPID. Mediante curva ROC se calculó el valor de corte de TIR para el diagnóstico de FQ, que fue 76,2ng/ml (S=95,7%, E=64,5%). Conclusiones: Los RN con FQ presentan cifras significativamente más elevadas de TIR que sanos, portadores o CFSPID. La prematuridad y hospitalización también pueden influir. Un mayor valor de TIR se relaciona con una mayor cifra en el test del sudor. (AU)

Introduction: Neonatal cystic fibrosis (CF) screening has enabled the disease to be diagnosed early, and is a determining factor in the increase in survival of these patients. Its main disadvantage is its low specificity and elevated number of false positives. The aim of this study is to analyse the differences in immunoreactive trypsin (IRT) between the different groups of newborns (NB) with a positive neonatal screen depending on whether they were healthy, healthy carriers, affected by CF, or CFSPID (Cystic Fibrosis Screen Positive, Inconclusive Diagnosis). Material: Retrospective analytical study of the concentrations of IRT in NB with a positive neonatal screen for CF born in a tertiary hospital during an 8-year period. Results: A total of 790 NB with a positive neonatal screen for CF were analysed. Of these 86.3% were term, 53% girls, and 11.8% were admitted. The mean IRT value was 79.16 ng/mL (range 60 – 367). Significantly higher concentrations of IRT were found in those affected by CF compared to the other groups (P<.001). There were higher levels in large prematures (P=.007) and admitted patients (P=.002). There were no differences as regards gender or season. There was a direct correlation of 64% (P=.001) between IRT and sweat test in those affected by CF and CFSPID. A cut-off value of IRT for the diagnosis of CF was calculated from the ROC curve (76.2 ng/mL (S=95.7%, Sp=64.5%). Conclusions: NB with CF have significantly higher levels of IRT than healthy ones, or carriers and CFSPID. Prematurity and hospital admission may also have an influence. A higher IRT value is associated with a higher level in the sweat test.

Neonatal cystic fibrosis screening: Analysis and differences in immunoreactive trypsin levels in newborns with a positive screen.

INTRODUCTION: Neonatal cystic fibrosis (CF) screening has enabled the disease to be diagnosed early, and is a determining factor in the increase in survival of these patients. Its main disadvantage is its low specificity and elevated number of false positives. The aim of this study is to analyse the differences in immunoreactive trypsin (IRT) between the different groups of newborns (NB) with a positive neonatal screen depending on whether they were healthy, healthy carriers, affected by CF, or CFSPID (Cystic Fibrosis Screen Positive, Inconclusive Diagnosis). MATERIAL: Retrospective analytical study of the concentrations of IRT in NB with a positive neonatal screen for CF born in a tertiary hospital during an 8-year period. RESULTS: A total of 790 NB with a positive neonatal screen for CF were analysed. Of these 86.3% were term, 53% girls, and 11.8% were admitted. The mean IRT value was 79.16 ng/mL (range 60-367). Significantly higher concentrations of IRT were found in those affected by CF compared to the other groups (P < .001). There were higher levels in large prematures (P = .007) and admitted patients (P = .002). There were no differences as regards gender or season. There was a direct correlation of 64% (P = .001) between IRT and sweat test in those affected by CF and CFSPID. A cut-off value of IRT for the diagnosis of CF was calculated from the ROC curve (76.2 ng/mL (S = 95.7%, Sp = 64.5%). CONCLUSIONS: NB with CF have significantly higher levels of IRT than healthy ones, or carriers and CFSPID. Prematurity and hospital admission may also have an influence. A higher IRT value is associated with a higher level in the sweat test.

[Growth hormone deficit: Influence of puberty on the response to treatment]. / Déficit de hormona de crecimiento: influencia de la pubertad en la respuesta al tratamiento.

INTRODUCTION: Short stature is the most frequent reason for consultation in Pediatric Endocrinology consultations and sometimes requires treatment with growth hormone. The aim of the study was to analyze the response to treatment based on its onset in pubertal or prepubertal stages and to analyze the possible benefit of an early onset. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Longitudinal, retrospective and observational study in 139 patients treated for idiopathic growth hormone deficiency up to adult height. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: (a) genetic background: maternal, paternal and genetic height; (b) perinatal history; (c) anthropometry during follow-up and at pubertal onset: weight, height, body mass index; (d) variables during follow-up and at pubertal onset: growth rate, bone age and growth prognosis. Final response variables: adult height, adult height with respect to target height, adult height with respect to initial growth prediction, adult height with respect to initial height at the start of treatment and adult height with respect to height at pubertal onset. RESULTS: Total pubertal gain was 0.84±0.6 SD. 61.9% of the patients started treatment with rhGH in prepuberty. The initiation of treatment in the prepubertal stage and a higher total pubertal gain are correlated with a better final height (P=.001 and r=0.507, P=.00, respectively). Furthermore, a longer duration of treatment in pre-puberty is correlated with a better final response (r=0.328, P=.00). CONCLUSIONS: The start of treatment in the prepubertal stage and its longer duration during this period are determining factors to achieve a good long-term response. Total pubertal gain was greater in patients who started treatment in the pubertal stage.

Growth hormone deficit. Does the first year of treatment influence adult height? / Déficit de hormona de crecimiento, ¿influye el primer año de tratamiento en la talla final?

INTRODUCTION: Short stature is the most frequent reason for Pediatric Endocrinology consultations and sometimes requires treatment with growth hormone. OBJECTIVE: The possible correlation of a good response to any early response factor with a better final response was studied, and also whether there was a difference in response to treatment according to the type of deficit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a longitudinal, retrospective and observational study of 139 patients treated for idiopathic growth hormone deficiency up to adult height. There were good response criteria in the first year of treatment: a) an increase in growth rate≥3cm / year, b) a growth rate≥1 standard deviation (SD), c) an increase in height≥0.5 SD, d) an increase in height≥0.3 SD. Study of the Index of Responsiveness to treatment in the first and second year. Final response variables: adult height with respect to target height, adult height with respect to initial growth prediction and adult height with respect to initial height at the start of treatment. The possible correlation of a good response to any of the early response factors with a better final response to treatment was studied, and also whether there was a difference in the response to treatment according to the type of deficit. RESULTS: The treatment produced a gain in adult height with respect to genetic height of 0.06±0.7 SD. Patients considered good responders in the first year of treatment presented a better final response (growth rate≥3cm: p=0.000, growth rate≥1 SD: p=0.008, height gain≥0.5 SD: P=0.007, height gain≥0.3 SD: P=0.006), as well as patients with a severe deficit (P=0.04). The index of responsiveness to treatment during the first year was associated with a better final response (r=0.249, P=0.003), with this correlation being maintained in the second year (r=0.294, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Growth hormone treatment increased height in the genetic target. The percentage of good responders varied depending on the criteria used. The response in the first year of treatment and a severe deficit were determining factors for achieving a good long-term response.

Diabetes tipo MODY-3, no todo debut es diabetes tipo 1 / MODY 3 diabetes, not every early onset diabetes is type 1 diabetes

No disponible

Síndrome de Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser: descripción de 2 casos / Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: two case reports

No disponible